Precision Medicine Versus Evidence-Based Medicine
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Evidence Based Medicine and Herbal Medicine
Evidence based medicine (EBM) can be found as far back as the 1940s. However, it was in 1972 that the concept first came into play, originated by Professor Archie Cochrane, in his book, Effectiveness & Efficiency: Random Reflections on Health Services. This was the foundation for evidence based research, and in 1992 a facility was funded by the UK government, with the aim of performing r...
متن کاملEvidence Based Medicine: Clinical Trials
Evidence based medicine is very important for success of modern medicine. It is the ongoing process of using the most reliable evidence from clinical studies, scientific understanding and medical practice to make the best possible medical choice for patients. Evidence based medicine is how medicine advances and how we get improvements in life expectancy and quality of life. It not only identifi...
متن کامل[Evidence-based versus evidence-biased medicine].
Due to a burden of multiple chronic diseases, older patients are the greatest consumers of healthcare resources. However, randomized clinical trials (RCT) have excluded most older patients for many reasons, ranging from comorbidities to disability or cognitive impairment. Systematic reviews demonstrate that such stringent exclusion criteria, frequently poorly justified, are still adopted by ong...
متن کاملEvidence-based medicine versus liquid based cytology.
I this issue, Arbyn et al (see p. 167) update the evidence about the accuracy of liquid-based cytology compared with conventional cytology, and the results are not encouraging.1 In summary, best evidence suggests that liquid-based cytology does not lead to more disease detection and appears to increase false-positive testing, sobering news given that over 80% of U.S. obstetrician–gynecologists ...
متن کاملEvidence-Based Medicine Versus Liquid-Based Cytology
I this issue, Arbyn et al (see p. 167) update the evidence about the accuracy of liquid-based cytology compared with conventional cytology, and the results are not encouraging.1 In summary, best evidence suggests that liquid-based cytology does not lead to more disease detection and appears to increase false-positive testing, sobering news given that over 80% of U.S. obstetrician–gynecologists ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Circulation
سال: 2019
ISSN: 0009-7322,1524-4539
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.119.043014